Over the last few years, the last remaining sacred place for original, agency grown, highly anticipated, super expensive, self-proclaimed talk value, advertising has been compromised. The Super Bowl. Marketers, brands and agencies have turned over the ads– to the people.
We’ve all heard about it, read about it, wrote about it and talked about it. Consumer control. It’s played out in marketing campaigns in different ways:
- Real people: use a real person with real stories in a campaign.
- Real causes: align a brand with real causes that impact real lives and therefore showing real people.
- Real voices: letting consumers influence products and marketing. Focus groups 3.2. Usually plays out in voting, discussions, idea submission.
- The new celebrity: Align a marketing campaign with a real person and make them your voice. Usually said real person already has a following or credentials that make them interesting
- Take it (crowd sourcing, idea sourcing, creative contest– whatever you want to call it today): Turn your brand over (enough of it) to real people, tell them what you want and see what they come up with. Because, really, it is just that easy to do our jobs.
The Super Bowl has become a place you can see all of this- there are no secrets (Google may be trying to prove me wrong). You can see the ads before hand, vote on which ad wins, vote on who will be in the ads, leak the ads, create your own ads, and on and on and on.
And gasp, some advertisers run old tv spots that they have been running for a year. In the past that could work. You have a captive audience, one looking forward to ads. You want everyone to see your ad, you throw it up, and even though it’s not new, people see it. And in some cases, it’s new to them.
Does all of this ruin the anticipation of the ads? Or, what 51% of viewers enjoy more than the game (according to USA Today/Nielsen Co. Survey). Did marketers ruin it? On purpose? Or will they look back and kick themselves? Or is the final dinosaur becoming extinct?
When does the Super Bowl become less valuable? If brands don’t hold true to the unspoken, elite club rule– spend money to make the ads new and something to talk about or people will stop watching them- does the marketer when or lose?
A few more years of advertisers testing other outlets and means to get content in front of people (small audiences, more often) and in their hands, the Super Bowl becomes just another football game. Just like the World Series, Stanley Cup, March Madness, Bowl games and any other awards based show. They will be able to demand a slight premium, but not Super Bowl premiums.
Don’t expect the NFL and networks to go quietly. They will create stunts, reasons to watch and may even try to demand only ‘new, never before seen content’ can air during the game (this probably won’t work). Networks need the ads to be good. They need people to be captivated the entire game. They expect the money and put a lot of hope into the lead out program- the first program after the Super Bowl.
Examples of lead out programs: Friends, X-Files, Simpsons, Survivor, Alias, Gery’s Anatomy, House. This year it will be Undercover Boss. Wait, isn’t this a show about real people working hard and the guy who doesn’t ‘get it’(the proverbial man) who has lost perspective on what real people need and want from his office in a big city? Well hell, maybe the networks are in on this too.
I guess we will see tomorrow morning. My guess, the headlines read “Meh. Nothing new- but it was cool how Miller High Life let the little guy into their ads” and/or “The big Super Bowl winner: Pepsi”